Eswatini vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Processing — Energy Use (Coal)

Eswatini
2,993 TJ
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
35,731 TJ
in 2023
Eswatini rank
17th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
16th

Food Processing — Energy Use (Coal) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020062023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 35,731 TJ against 2,993 TJ in Eswatini, a difference of 32,738 TJ.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 11.9 times Eswatini's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Eswatini ranks 17th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th of 56 countries.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 1,838 TJ 2,037 TJ 199.28 TJ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1,747 TJ 5,689 TJ 3,941 TJ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 2,235 TJ 11,613 TJ 9,378 TJ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 2,550 TJ 23,396 TJ 20,845 TJ Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food processing — energy use, Eswatini or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 35,731 TJ against 2,993 TJ in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in food processing — energy use between Eswatini and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
32,738 TJ, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for food processing — energy use?
Eswatini ranks 17th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 16th of 56 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Processing — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-coal/eswatini/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-coal/eswatini/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Eswatini vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Food Processing — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Processing — Energy Use (Coal)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
86 places, 2,169 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain Emissions from Pre- and Post-Agricultural Production provides estimates of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and related activity data associated with pre- and post-production stages of agrifood systems. The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2), fluorinated gases (F-gases) and their aggregates expressed in carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2eq). Estimates are computed following Tier 1 methods of the IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014) and are disseminated annually.