Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Food Processing — Energy Use
Food Processing — Energy Use over time
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
- United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
How they compare
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 35,731 TJ against 2,844 TJ in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 32,887 TJ.
That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 12.6 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 17th of 29 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) averaged higher in 3 and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,037 TJ | 25,726 TJ | 23,690 TJ | United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland |
| 2000s | 5,689 TJ | 1,873 TJ | 3,816 TJ | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2010s | 11,613 TJ | 3,225 TJ | 8,389 TJ | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2020s | 23,396 TJ | 3,101 TJ | 20,295 TJ | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food processing — energy use, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 35,731 TJ against 2,844 TJ in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food processing — energy use between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 32,887 TJ, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for food processing — energy use?
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 17th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.