Middle Africa vs Republic of Moldova: Food Processing — Energy Use

Middle Africa
1,934 TJ
in 2023
Republic of Moldova
1,125 TJ
in 2023
Middle Africa rank
5th
Republic of Moldova rank
6th

Food Processing — Energy Use over time

  • Middle Africa
  • Republic of Moldova
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199420082023

How they compare

Middle Africa currently reports 1,934 TJ against 1,125 TJ in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 809 TJ.

That makes Middle Africa's figure about 1.7 times Republic of Moldova's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Republic of Moldova ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 5th and Republic of Moldova ranks 6th of 7 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Moldova in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
2000s 878.4 TJ 879.6 TJ 1.2 TJ Republic of Moldova
2010s 1,301 TJ 1,286 TJ 14.94 TJ Middle Africa
2020s 1,829 TJ 1,201 TJ 628.44 TJ Middle Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food processing — energy use, Middle Africa or Republic of Moldova?
Middle Africa, at 1,934 TJ against 1,125 TJ in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
What is the difference in food processing — energy use between Middle Africa and Republic of Moldova?
809 TJ, with Middle Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Republic of Moldova?
17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
How do Middle Africa and Republic of Moldova rank globally for food processing — energy use?
Middle Africa ranks 5th and Republic of Moldova ranks 6th of 7 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Energy Use (Electricity). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs Republic of Moldova: Food Processing — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-electricity/middle-africa/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-electricity/middle-africa/republic-of-moldova/">Middle Africa vs Republic of Moldova: Food Processing — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Processing — Energy Use (Electricity)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
122 places, 3,125 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.