China, Taiwan Province of vs Romania: Food Processing — Energy Use

China, Taiwan Province of
14,850 TJ
in 2023
Romania
16,102 TJ
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
24th
Romania rank
21st

Food Processing — Energy Use over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Romania
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020062023

How they compare

Romania currently reports 16,102 TJ against 14,850 TJ in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 1,252 TJ.

That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times China, Taiwan Province of's.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Romania has been ahead every year.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 24th and Romania ranks 21st of 65 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Romania Difference Ahead
1990s 733.38 TJ 23,665 TJ 22,932 TJ Romania
2000s 1,016 TJ 16,388 TJ 15,372 TJ Romania
2010s 3,634 TJ 13,847 TJ 10,213 TJ Romania
2020s 13,020 TJ 15,103 TJ 2,083 TJ Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food processing — energy use, China, Taiwan Province of or Romania?
Romania, at 16,102 TJ against 14,850 TJ in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2023.
What is the difference in food processing — energy use between China, Taiwan Province of and Romania?
1,252 TJ, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Romania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Romania rank globally for food processing — energy use?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 24th and Romania ranks 21st of 65 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Romania: Food Processing — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/china-taiwan-province-of/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/china-taiwan-province-of/romania/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Romania: Food Processing — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Processing — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
103 places, 2,634 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.