China, Taiwan Province of vs Ukraine: Food Processing — Energy Use

China, Taiwan Province of
32,996 TJ
in 2023
Ukraine
38,792 TJ
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
25th
Ukraine rank
22nd

Food Processing — Energy Use over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Ukraine
020.0k40.0k60.0k199020062023

How they compare

Ukraine currently reports 38,792 TJ against 32,996 TJ in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 5,796 TJ.

That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.2 times China, Taiwan Province of's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 22nd of 89 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Taiwan Province of averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Ukraine Difference Ahead
2000s 13,998 TJ 1,187 TJ 12,811 TJ China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 21,725 TJ 38,095 TJ 16,370 TJ Ukraine
2020s 31,952 TJ 50,154 TJ 18,202 TJ Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food processing — energy use, China, Taiwan Province of or Ukraine?
Ukraine, at 38,792 TJ against 32,996 TJ in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2023.
What is the difference in food processing — energy use between China, Taiwan Province of and Ukraine?
5,796 TJ, with Ukraine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Ukraine?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Ukraine rank globally for food processing — energy use?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 25th and Ukraine ranks 22nd of 89 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Processing — Energy Use (Total). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Ukraine: Food Processing — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-total/china-taiwan-province-of/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-processing-energy-use-total/china-taiwan-province-of/ukraine/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Ukraine: Food Processing — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Processing — Energy Use (Total)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
128 places, 3,328 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.