Congo vs Luxembourg: Food Retail — Emissions
Food Retail — Emissions over time
- Congo
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 90.9 kt against 87.27 kt in Congo, a difference of 3.63 kt.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 120th and Luxembourg ranks 119th of 190 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38.92 kt | 119.96 kt | 81.03 kt | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 80.38 kt | 102.33 kt | 21.95 kt | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions, Congo or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 90.9 kt against 87.27 kt in Congo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Congo and Luxembourg?
- 3.63 kt, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Luxembourg?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Luxembourg rank globally for food retail — emissions?
- Congo ranks 120th and Luxembourg ranks 119th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf