Nauru vs Vanuatu: Food Retail — Emissions
Food Retail — Emissions over time
- Nauru
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 1.64 kt against 1.33 kt in Nauru, a difference of 0.31 kt.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.2 times Nauru's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Vanuatu ahead.
Nauru ranks 213th and Vanuatu ranks 211th of 222 countries.
Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.18 kt | 1.85 kt | 0.6717 kt | Vanuatu |
| 2010s | 0.8816 kt | 1.89 kt | 1.01 kt | Vanuatu |
| 2020s | 1.31 kt | 1.57 kt | 0.2566 kt | Vanuatu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions, Nauru or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 1.64 kt against 1.33 kt in Nauru as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Nauru and Vanuatu?
- 0.31 kt, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Vanuatu?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Vanuatu rank globally for food retail — emissions?
- Nauru ranks 213th and Vanuatu ranks 211th of 222 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf