Azerbaijan vs Serbia: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq)
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Azerbaijan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 1,556 kt against 1,536 kt in Azerbaijan, a difference of 20 kt.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 59th of 203 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,062 kt | 1,153 kt | 90.88 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 1,101 kt | 1,549 kt | 447.41 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 1,487 kt | 1,535 kt | 48.01 kt | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq), Azerbaijan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 1,556 kt against 1,536 kt in Azerbaijan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) between Azerbaijan and Serbia?
- 20 kt, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Azerbaijan and Serbia rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq)?
- Azerbaijan ranks 60th and Serbia ranks 59th of 203 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf