Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uganda: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
41,701 kt
in 2023
Uganda
6,066 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
12th
Uganda rank
15th

Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Uganda
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 41,701 kt against 6,066 kt in Uganda, a difference of 35,635 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 6.9 times Uganda's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th and Uganda ranks 15th of 33 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 4,717 kt 127.08 kt 4,590 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 9,991 kt 916.26 kt 9,075 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 22,832 kt 3,353 kt 19,479 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 40,780 kt 5,933 kt 34,847 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Uganda?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 41,701 kt against 6,066 kt in Uganda as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda?
35,635 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uganda rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 12th and Uganda ranks 15th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uganda: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-emissions-co2eq-from-f-gases-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-emissions-co2eq-from-f-gases-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uganda/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uganda: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
252 places, 8,384 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf