Lithuania vs Sudan: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5), per capita
Lithuania
0 kt per person
in 2023
Sudan
0 kt per person
in 2023
Lithuania rank
119th
Sudan rank
117th
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5), per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 119th and Sudan ranks 117th of 178 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases (ar5), per capita, Lithuania or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases (ar5), per capita between Lithuania and Sudan?
- 0 kt per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Sudan rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq) from f-gases (ar5), per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 119th and Sudan ranks 117th of 178 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from F-gases (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.