Niger vs Serbia: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Niger
- Serbia
How they compare
Niger currently reports 2.47 kt against 2.45 kt in Serbia, a difference of 0.02 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Niger ahead.
Niger ranks 51st and Serbia ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.91 kt | 2.35 kt | 0.4365 kt | Serbia |
| 2010s | 2.15 kt | 2.51 kt | 0.3641 kt | Serbia |
| 2020s | 2.45 kt | 2.39 kt | 0.054 kt | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Niger or Serbia?
- Niger, at 2.47 kt against 2.45 kt in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Niger and Serbia?
- 0.02 kt, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Niger and Serbia rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Niger ranks 51st and Serbia ranks 53rd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf