Rwanda vs Suriname: Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O
Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time
- Rwanda
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.0575 kt against 0.057 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0005 kt.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 153rd and Suriname ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0322 kt | 0.1256 kt | 0.0934 kt | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.0471 kt | 0.0554 kt | 0.0083 kt | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Rwanda or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.0575 kt against 0.057 kt in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Rwanda and Suriname?
- 0.0005 kt, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Suriname?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2023.
- How do Rwanda and Suriname rank globally for food retail — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
- Rwanda ranks 153rd and Suriname ranks 152nd of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf