Aruba vs Djibouti: Food Retail — Emissions
Food Retail — Emissions over time
- Aruba
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 0.0006 kt against 0.0005 kt in Aruba, a difference of 0.0001 kt.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.2 times Aruba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 134th and Djibouti ranks 131st of 190 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Djibouti in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0001 kt | 0.0004 kt | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0002 kt | 0.0003 kt | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt | 0.0005 kt | 0 kt | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food retail — emissions, Aruba or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at 0.0006 kt against 0.0005 kt in Aruba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Aruba and Djibouti?
- 0.0001 kt, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Djibouti?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Djibouti rank globally for food retail — emissions?
- Aruba ranks 134th and Djibouti ranks 131st of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf