Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Food Retail — Emissions

Australia and New Zealand
0.0557 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
0.2965 kt
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
18th
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
14th

Food Retail — Emissions over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
00.10.20.3199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 0.2965 kt against 0.0557 kt in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.2408 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 5.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 222 countries.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.039 kt 0.0523 kt 0.0133 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 0.0626 kt 0.0949 kt 0.0323 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 0.063 kt 0.1522 kt 0.0892 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 0.0561 kt 0.2672 kt 0.2111 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — emissions, Australia and New Zealand or Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 0.2965 kt against 0.0557 kt in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — emissions between Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
0.2408 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank globally for food retail — emissions?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 18th and Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 14th of 222 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Food Retail — Emissions. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-emissions-n2o-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/">Australia and New Zealand vs Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs): Food Retail — Emissions</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Retail — Emissions (N2O)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
255 places, 7,872 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf