Australia and New Zealand vs Lithuania: Food Retail — Energy Use

Australia and New Zealand
223.53 TJ
in 2023
Lithuania
207.75 TJ
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
42nd
Lithuania rank
44th

Food Retail — Energy Use over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Lithuania
02.0k4.0k6.0k199020062023

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 223.53 TJ against 207.75 TJ in Lithuania, a difference of 15.78 TJ.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 42nd and Lithuania ranks 44th of 89 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 1,705 TJ 3,775 TJ 2,070 TJ Lithuania
2000s 1,381 TJ 1,119 TJ 261.83 TJ Australia and New Zealand
2010s 595.57 TJ 943.98 TJ 348.41 TJ Lithuania
2020s 338.49 TJ 500.46 TJ 161.98 TJ Lithuania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — energy use, Australia and New Zealand or Lithuania?
Australia and New Zealand, at 223.53 TJ against 207.75 TJ in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — energy use between Australia and New Zealand and Lithuania?
15.78 TJ, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Lithuania?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Lithuania rank globally for food retail — energy use?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 42nd and Lithuania ranks 44th of 89 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Energy Use (Coal). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Lithuania: Food Retail — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-coal/australia-and-new-zealand/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-coal/australia-and-new-zealand/lithuania/">Australia and New Zealand vs Lithuania: Food Retail — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Retail — Energy Use (Coal)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
129 places, 2,936 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.