Australia and New Zealand vs Uzbekistan: Food Retail — Energy Use

Australia and New Zealand
14,052 TJ
in 2023
Uzbekistan
23,545 TJ
in 2023
Australia and New Zealand rank
20th
Uzbekistan rank
17th

Food Retail — Energy Use over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Uzbekistan
10.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k50.0k199020062023

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 23,545 TJ against 14,052 TJ in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 9,493 TJ.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.7 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 71 countries.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s 12,508 TJ 38,684 TJ 26,176 TJ Uzbekistan
2000s 12,566 TJ 47,183 TJ 34,616 TJ Uzbekistan
2010s 13,664 TJ 37,238 TJ 23,574 TJ Uzbekistan
2020s 13,046 TJ 34,026 TJ 20,980 TJ Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — energy use, Australia and New Zealand or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 23,545 TJ against 14,052 TJ in Australia and New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — energy use between Australia and New Zealand and Uzbekistan?
9,493 TJ, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Uzbekistan?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Uzbekistan rank globally for food retail — energy use?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Uzbekistan ranks 17th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Uzbekistan: Food Retail — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/australia-and-new-zealand/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/australia-and-new-zealand/uzbekistan/">Australia and New Zealand vs Uzbekistan: Food Retail — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Retail — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
107 places, 2,853 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.