Barbados vs China, Macao SAR: Food Retail — Energy Use

Barbados
205.2 TJ
in 2023
China, Macao SAR
142.63 TJ
in 2023
Barbados rank
64th
China, Macao SAR rank
66th

Food Retail — Energy Use over time

  • Barbados
  • China, Macao SAR
050100150200250199020062023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 205.2 TJ against 142.63 TJ in China, Macao SAR, a difference of 62.57 TJ.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.4 times China, Macao SAR's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 64th and China, Macao SAR ranks 66th of 71 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados China, Macao SAR Difference Ahead
2010s 210.58 TJ 66.08 TJ 144.5 TJ Barbados
2020s 173.62 TJ 107.84 TJ 65.79 TJ Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — energy use, Barbados or China, Macao SAR?
Barbados, at 205.2 TJ against 142.63 TJ in China, Macao SAR as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — energy use between Barbados and China, Macao SAR?
62.57 TJ, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and China, Macao SAR?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Barbados and China, Macao SAR rank globally for food retail — energy use?
Barbados ranks 64th and China, Macao SAR ranks 66th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs China, Macao SAR: Food Retail — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/barbados/china-macao-sar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/barbados/china-macao-sar/">Barbados vs China, Macao SAR: Food Retail — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Retail — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
107 places, 2,853 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.