Chile vs China, Taiwan Province of: Food Retail — Energy Use

Chile
3,991 TJ
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of
4,252 TJ
in 2023
Chile rank
40th
China, Taiwan Province of rank
38th

Food Retail — Energy Use over time

  • Chile
  • China, Taiwan Province of
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k199020062023

How they compare

China, Taiwan Province of currently reports 4,252 TJ against 3,991 TJ in Chile, a difference of 261 TJ.

That makes China, Taiwan Province of's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, China, Taiwan Province of has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 40th and China, Taiwan Province of ranks 38th of 71 countries.

China, Taiwan Province of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile China, Taiwan Province of Difference Ahead
1990s 728.35 TJ 1,599 TJ 870.44 TJ China, Taiwan Province of
2000s 2,346 TJ 3,289 TJ 943.45 TJ China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 3,518 TJ 4,820 TJ 1,302 TJ China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 3,668 TJ 4,289 TJ 620.97 TJ China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — energy use, Chile or China, Taiwan Province of?
China, Taiwan Province of, at 4,252 TJ against 3,991 TJ in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — energy use between Chile and China, Taiwan Province of?
261 TJ, with China, Taiwan Province of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and China, Taiwan Province of?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Chile and China, Taiwan Province of rank globally for food retail — energy use?
Chile ranks 40th and China, Taiwan Province of ranks 38th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs China, Taiwan Province of: Food Retail — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/chile/china-taiwan-province-of/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/chile/china-taiwan-province-of/">Chile vs China, Taiwan Province of: Food Retail — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Retail — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
107 places, 2,853 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.