China, Macao SAR vs Norway: Food Retail — Energy Use

China, Macao SAR
142.63 TJ
in 2023
Norway
130.5 TJ
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
66th
Norway rank
67th

Food Retail — Energy Use over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Norway
0200400600200020112023

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 142.63 TJ against 130.5 TJ in Norway, a difference of 12.13 TJ.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Norway ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 66th and Norway ranks 67th of 71 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Norway Difference Ahead
2010s 66.08 TJ 378.72 TJ 312.64 TJ Norway
2020s 107.84 TJ 218.21 TJ 110.37 TJ Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — energy use, China, Macao SAR or Norway?
China, Macao SAR, at 142.63 TJ against 130.5 TJ in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — energy use between China, Macao SAR and Norway?
12.13 TJ, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Norway?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and Norway rank globally for food retail — energy use?
China, Macao SAR ranks 66th and Norway ranks 67th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Norway: Food Retail — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/china-macao-sar/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/china-macao-sar/norway/">China, Macao SAR vs Norway: Food Retail — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Retail — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
107 places, 2,853 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.