China, Taiwan Province of vs Serbia: Food Retail — Energy Use

China, Taiwan Province of
4,252 TJ
in 2023
Serbia
4,451 TJ
in 2023
China, Taiwan Province of rank
38th
Serbia rank
36th

Food Retail — Energy Use over time

  • China, Taiwan Province of
  • Serbia
1.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k199020062023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 4,451 TJ against 4,252 TJ in China, Taiwan Province of, a difference of 199 TJ.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was China, Taiwan Province of ahead.

China, Taiwan Province of ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 36th of 71 countries.

China, Taiwan Province of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Taiwan Province of Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 4,393 TJ 1,408 TJ 2,985 TJ China, Taiwan Province of
2010s 4,820 TJ 2,070 TJ 2,750 TJ China, Taiwan Province of
2020s 4,289 TJ 4,027 TJ 261.71 TJ China, Taiwan Province of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food retail — energy use, China, Taiwan Province of or Serbia?
Serbia, at 4,451 TJ against 4,252 TJ in China, Taiwan Province of as of 2023.
What is the difference in food retail — energy use between China, Taiwan Province of and Serbia?
199 TJ, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Taiwan Province of and Serbia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do China, Taiwan Province of and Serbia rank globally for food retail — energy use?
China, Taiwan Province of ranks 38th and Serbia ranks 36th of 71 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Retail — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Taiwan Province of vs Serbia: Food Retail — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/china-taiwan-province-of/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-retail-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/china-taiwan-province-of/serbia/">China, Taiwan Province of vs Serbia: Food Retail — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Retail — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
107 places, 2,853 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.