Angola vs Bangladesh: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Angola
68.2%
in 2015
Bangladesh
68.3%
in 2015
Angola rank
69th
Bangladesh rank
68th
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time
- Angola
- Bangladesh
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 68.3% against 68.2% in Angola, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bangladesh ahead.
Angola ranks 69th and Bangladesh ranks 68th of 217 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Bangladesh | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 70.8% | 87.1% | 16.3% | Bangladesh |
| 2000s | 73.9% | 80.2% | 6.3% | Bangladesh |
| 2010s | 70.4% | 71.5% | 1.1% | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Angola or Bangladesh?
- Bangladesh, at 68.3% against 68.2% in Angola as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Angola and Bangladesh?
- 0.1%, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Bangladesh?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Angola and Bangladesh rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
- Angola ranks 69th and Bangladesh ranks 68th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.