Angola vs Comoros: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food

Angola
68.2%
in 2015
Comoros
67.5%
in 2015
Angola rank
69th
Comoros rank
70th

Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time

  • Angola
  • Comoros
020406080199020022015

How they compare

Angola currently reports 68.2% against 67.5% in Comoros, a difference of 0.7%.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Comoros ahead.

Angola ranks 69th and Comoros ranks 70th of 217 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 2 and Comoros in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Comoros Difference Ahead
1990s 70.8% 79.1% 8.4% Comoros
2000s 73.9% 73.3% 0.6% Angola
2010s 70.4% 68.4% 2.0% Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Angola or Comoros?
Angola, at 68.2% against 67.5% in Comoros as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Angola and Comoros?
0.7%, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Comoros?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Angola and Comoros rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
Angola ranks 69th and Comoros ranks 70th of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.