Antigua and Barbuda vs China: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Antigua and Barbuda
19.4%
in 2015
China
18.9%
in 2015
Antigua and Barbuda rank
169th
China rank
172nd
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time
- Antigua and Barbuda
- China
How they compare
Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 19.4% against 18.9% in China, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and China ranks 172nd of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Antigua and Barbuda | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 33.4% | 40.3% | 6.9% | China |
| 2000s | 32.4% | 27.7% | 4.7% | Antigua and Barbuda |
| 2010s | 20.6% | 19.6% | 1.1% | Antigua and Barbuda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Antigua and Barbuda or China?
- Antigua and Barbuda, at 19.4% against 18.9% in China as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Antigua and Barbuda and China?
- 0.5%, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and China?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Antigua and Barbuda and China rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
- Antigua and Barbuda ranks 169th and China ranks 172nd of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.