Bahamas vs British Virgin Islands: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time
- Bahamas
- British Virgin Islands
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 18.1% against 17.0% in British Virgin Islands, a difference of 1.1%.
That makes Bahamas's figure about 1.1 times British Virgin Islands's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.
Bahamas ranks 176th and British Virgin Islands ranks 177th of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and British Virgin Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | British Virgin Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 114.5% | 46.7% | 67.8% | Bahamas |
| 2000s | 32.1% | 34.2% | 2.0% | British Virgin Islands |
| 2010s | 17.4% | 17.9% | 0.5% | British Virgin Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Bahamas or British Virgin Islands?
- Bahamas, at 18.1% against 17.0% in British Virgin Islands as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Bahamas and British Virgin Islands?
- 1.1%, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and British Virgin Islands?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Bahamas and British Virgin Islands rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
- Bahamas ranks 176th and British Virgin Islands ranks 177th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.