Falkland Islands vs Tuvalu: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Falkland Islands
92.1%
in 2015
Tuvalu
93.6%
in 2015
Falkland Islands rank
30th
Tuvalu rank
27th
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time
- Falkland Islands
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 93.6% against 92.1% in Falkland Islands, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Falkland Islands ranks 30th and Tuvalu ranks 27th of 217 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Falkland Islands | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89.1% | 125.2% | 36.0% | Tuvalu |
| 2000s | 96.6% | 149.4% | 52.8% | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 93.4% | 111.6% | 18.2% | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Falkland Islands or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 93.6% against 92.1% in Falkland Islands as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Falkland Islands and Tuvalu?
- 1.5%, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Falkland Islands and Tuvalu?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Falkland Islands and Tuvalu rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
- Falkland Islands ranks 30th and Tuvalu ranks 27th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.