Jamaica vs Turkmenistan: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Jamaica
22.9%
in 2015
Turkmenistan
21.6%
in 2015
Jamaica rank
159th
Turkmenistan rank
162nd
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time
- Jamaica
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Jamaica currently reports 22.9% against 21.6% in Turkmenistan, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 159th and Turkmenistan ranks 162nd of 217 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.7% | 19.9% | 3.8% | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 20.8% | 21.9% | 1.1% | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 23.5% | 21.9% | 1.6% | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Jamaica or Turkmenistan?
- Jamaica, at 22.9% against 21.6% in Turkmenistan as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Jamaica and Turkmenistan?
- 1.3%, with Jamaica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Turkmenistan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Jamaica and Turkmenistan rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
- Jamaica ranks 159th and Turkmenistan ranks 162nd of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.