Madagascar vs Nepal: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food

Madagascar
79.4%
in 2015
Nepal
80.1%
in 2015
Madagascar rank
52nd
Nepal rank
51st

Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time

  • Madagascar
  • Nepal
0255075100125199020022015

How they compare

Nepal currently reports 80.1% against 79.4% in Madagascar, a difference of 0.7%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nepal ahead.

Madagascar ranks 52nd and Nepal ranks 51st of 217 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Madagascar averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s 97.9% 112.7% 14.7% Nepal
2000s 101.2% 91.5% 9.7% Madagascar
2010s 85.3% 82.1% 3.3% Madagascar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Madagascar or Nepal?
Nepal, at 80.1% against 79.4% in Madagascar as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Madagascar and Nepal?
0.7%, with Nepal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar and Nepal?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Madagascar and Nepal rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
Madagascar ranks 52nd and Nepal ranks 51st of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.