Malawi vs Niger: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food

Malawi
92.8%
in 2015
Niger
90.9%
in 2015
Malawi rank
28th
Niger rank
31st

Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time

  • Malawi
  • Niger
0255075100199020022015

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 92.8% against 90.9% in Niger, a difference of 1.9%.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 28th and Niger ranks 31st of 217 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Niger Difference Ahead
1990s 99.2% 91.9% 7.3% Malawi
2000s 100.7% 96.9% 3.8% Malawi
2010s 94.5% 91.8% 2.7% Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Malawi or Niger?
Malawi, at 92.8% against 90.9% in Niger as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Malawi and Niger?
1.9%, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Niger?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Malawi and Niger rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
Malawi ranks 28th and Niger ranks 31st of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.