Malawi vs Tuvalu: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food

Malawi
92.8%
in 2015
Tuvalu
93.6%
in 2015
Malawi rank
28th
Tuvalu rank
27th

Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time

  • Malawi
  • Tuvalu
050100150200199020022015

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 93.6% against 92.8% in Malawi, a difference of 0.8%.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Malawi ranks 28th and Tuvalu ranks 27th of 217 countries.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1990s 99.2% 125.2% 26.0% Tuvalu
2000s 100.7% 149.4% 48.7% Tuvalu
2010s 94.5% 111.6% 17.1% Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Malawi or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 93.6% against 92.8% in Malawi as of 2015.
What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Malawi and Tuvalu?
0.8%, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Tuvalu?
26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
How do Malawi and Tuvalu rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
Malawi ranks 28th and Tuvalu ranks 27th of 217 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Unit
%
Source
Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
217 places, 5,642 data points, 1990–2015
Last refreshed

Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.