New Zealand vs Wallis and Futuna: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
New Zealand
83.5%
in 2015
Wallis and Futuna
85.8%
in 2015
New Zealand rank
41st
Wallis and Futuna rank
39th
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time
- New Zealand
- Wallis and Futuna
How they compare
Wallis and Futuna currently reports 85.8% against 83.5% in New Zealand, a difference of 2.3%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Wallis and Futuna has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 41st and Wallis and Futuna ranks 39th of 217 countries.
Wallis and Futuna has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Wallis and Futuna | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 99.7% | 156.2% | 56.4% | Wallis and Futuna |
| 2000s | 82.5% | 158.0% | 75.6% | Wallis and Futuna |
| 2010s | 84.5% | 98.3% | 13.7% | Wallis and Futuna |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, New Zealand or Wallis and Futuna?
- Wallis and Futuna, at 85.8% against 83.5% in New Zealand as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between New Zealand and Wallis and Futuna?
- 2.3%, with Wallis and Futuna ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Wallis and Futuna?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do New Zealand and Wallis and Futuna rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
- New Zealand ranks 41st and Wallis and Futuna ranks 39th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.