Nicaragua vs Wallis and Futuna: Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food
Nicaragua
88.6%
in 2015
Wallis and Futuna
85.8%
in 2015
Nicaragua rank
36th
Wallis and Futuna rank
39th
Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food over time
- Nicaragua
- Wallis and Futuna
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 88.6% against 85.8% in Wallis and Futuna, a difference of 2.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Wallis and Futuna ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 36th and Wallis and Futuna ranks 39th of 217 countries.
Wallis and Futuna has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Wallis and Futuna | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.5% | 156.2% | 63.7% | Wallis and Futuna |
| 2000s | 96.0% | 158.0% | 62.0% | Wallis and Futuna |
| 2010s | 93.3% | 98.3% | 5.0% | Wallis and Futuna |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food, Nicaragua or Wallis and Futuna?
- Nicaragua, at 88.6% against 85.8% in Wallis and Futuna as of 2015.
- What is the difference in share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food between Nicaragua and Wallis and Futuna?
- 2.8%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Wallis and Futuna?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2015.
- How do Nicaragua and Wallis and Futuna rank globally for share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food?
- Nicaragua ranks 36th and Wallis and Futuna ranks 39th of 217 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Crippa et al. (2021) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of national greenhouse gas emissions that come from food. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food system emissions include agriculture, land-use change, and supply chain emissions (transport, packaging, food processing, retail, cooking, and waste). Emissions are quantified based on food production, not consumption. This means they do not account for international trade.