Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate

Mauritius
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Mauritius rank
88th
Zimbabwe rank
88th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • Mauritius
  • Zimbabwe
-250255075199120072023

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 244 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 6.63 % change on previous year 6.65 % change on previous year 0.0245 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 2.26 % change on previous year -8.57 % change on previous year 10.84 % change on previous year Mauritius
2010s 3.38 % change on previous year 9.61 % change on previous year 6.23 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s -0.5189 % change on previous year 4.04 % change on previous year 4.56 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
Mauritius, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
0 % change on previous year, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
Mauritius ranks 88th and Zimbabwe ranks 88th of 244 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/mauritius/zimbabwe/">Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
277 places, 8,831 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.