Monaco vs Namibia: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate

Monaco
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Namibia
0 % change on previous year
in 2023
Monaco rank
88th
Namibia rank
88th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate over time

  • Monaco
  • Namibia
0200400600199120072023

How they compare

Monaco currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Namibia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Monaco ahead.

Monaco ranks 88th and Namibia ranks 88th of 244 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Monaco averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Monaco Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 91.76 % change on previous year 6.59 % change on previous year 85.18 % change on previous year Monaco
2000s 13.19 % change on previous year 3.79 % change on previous year 9.4 % change on previous year Monaco
2010s 0.8374 % change on previous year 3.42 % change on previous year 2.59 % change on previous year Namibia
2020s -0.1721 % change on previous year -1.82 % change on previous year 1.65 % change on previous year Monaco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate, Monaco or Namibia?
Monaco, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate between Monaco and Namibia?
0 % change on previous year, with Monaco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Monaco and Namibia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Monaco and Namibia rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), annual growth rate?
Monaco ranks 88th and Namibia ranks 88th of 244 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Monaco vs Namibia: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/monaco/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-annual-growth-rate/monaco/namibia/">Monaco vs Namibia: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
277 places, 8,831 data points, 1991–2023
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.