Kazakhstan vs Serbia: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Kazakhstan
0.0002 kt per person
in 2023
Serbia
0.0002 kt per person
in 2023
Kazakhstan rank
44th
Serbia rank
43rd
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.0002 kt per person against 0.0002 kt per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt per person.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Kazakhstan ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 43rd of 196 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 kt per person | 0.0001 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt per person | 0.0001 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Serbia |
| 2020s | 0.0001 kt per person | 0.0002 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, Kazakhstan or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.0002 kt per person against 0.0002 kt per person in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 0 kt per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Serbia rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 44th and Serbia ranks 43rd of 196 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.