New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita

New Zealand
0.0003 kt per person
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0004 kt per person
in 2023
New Zealand rank
13th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
12th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita over time

  • New Zealand
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00000199020062023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0004 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in New Zealand, a difference of 0.0001 kt per person.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

New Zealand ranks 13th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 12th of 196 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0003 kt per person 0 kt per person New Zealand
2000s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0 kt per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0 kt per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.0003 kt per person 0.0004 kt per person 0 kt per person Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita, New Zealand or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0004 kt per person against 0.0003 kt per person in New Zealand as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita between New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0001 kt per person, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do New Zealand and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per capita?
New Zealand ranks 13th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 12th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/new-zealand/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-capita/new-zealand/turks-and-caicos-islands/">New Zealand vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per capita
Unit
kt per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.