Australia vs Cuba: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Australia
0.0013 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba
0.0013 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
156th
Cuba rank
158th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Cuba
00.0020.0040.006199020062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0013 kt per square kilometre against 0.0013 kt per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.

Australia ranks 156th and Cuba ranks 158th of 196 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Cuba Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0035 kt per square kilometre 0.0026 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0018 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Australia or Cuba?
Australia, at 0.0013 kt per square kilometre against 0.0013 kt per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Australia and Cuba?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Cuba?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Australia and Cuba rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 156th and Cuba ranks 158th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Cuba: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/cuba/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/cuba/">Australia vs Cuba: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.