Australia vs Kazakhstan: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Australia
0.0013 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
0.0013 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
156th
Kazakhstan rank
157th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Australia
  • Kazakhstan
00.0010.0010.0010.001199020062023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 0.0013 kt per square kilometre against 0.0013 kt per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

Across all 32 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 156th and Kazakhstan ranks 157th of 196 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0005 kt per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.0013 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Australia or Kazakhstan?
Australia, at 0.0013 kt per square kilometre against 0.0013 kt per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Australia and Kazakhstan?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Kazakhstan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Australia and Kazakhstan rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Australia ranks 156th and Kazakhstan ranks 157th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Kazakhstan: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/australia/kazakhstan/">Australia vs Kazakhstan: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.