Bahamas vs Ecuador: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.0085 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.0085 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
81st
Ecuador rank
82nd

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Ecuador
0.0020.0040.0060.008199020062023

How they compare

Bahamas currently reports 0.0085 kt per square kilometre against 0.0085 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 81st and Ecuador ranks 82nd of 196 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Ecuador Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre 0.0014 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.0046 kt per square kilometre 0.0023 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.007 kt per square kilometre 0.0007 kt per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Bahamas or Ecuador?
Bahamas, at 0.0085 kt per square kilometre against 0.0085 kt per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Bahamas and Ecuador?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Bahamas ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Ecuador?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Ecuador rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 81st and Ecuador ranks 82nd of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Ecuador: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/ecuador/">Bahamas vs Ecuador: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.