Bahamas vs Tuvalu: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Bahamas
0.0085 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
0.0091 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Bahamas rank
81st
Tuvalu rank
79th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Bahamas
  • Tuvalu
00.0050.010.0150.02199020062023

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports 0.0091 kt per square kilometre against 0.0085 kt per square kilometre in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0006 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Tuvalu's figure about 1.1 times Bahamas's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Bahamas ranks 81st and Tuvalu ranks 79th of 196 countries.

Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0019 kt per square kilometre 0.0086 kt per square kilometre 0.0067 kt per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 0.0024 kt per square kilometre 0.0161 kt per square kilometre 0.0137 kt per square kilometre Tuvalu
2010s 0.0064 kt per square kilometre 0.012 kt per square kilometre 0.0056 kt per square kilometre Tuvalu
2020s 0.0079 kt per square kilometre 0.0088 kt per square kilometre 0.001 kt per square kilometre Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Bahamas or Tuvalu?
Tuvalu, at 0.0091 kt per square kilometre against 0.0085 kt per square kilometre in Bahamas as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Bahamas and Tuvalu?
0.0006 kt per square kilometre, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Tuvalu?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Bahamas and Tuvalu rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Bahamas ranks 81st and Tuvalu ranks 79th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Tuvalu: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/bahamas-the/tuvalu/">Bahamas vs Tuvalu: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.