Belarus vs Eswatini: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Belarus
0.0055 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.0056 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
98th
Eswatini rank
97th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Belarus
  • Eswatini
0.0020.0030.0040.0050.0060.007199020062023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.0056 kt per square kilometre against 0.0055 kt per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 0.0001 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 98th and Eswatini ranks 97th of 196 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0049 kt per square kilometre 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.0021 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2000s 0.0044 kt per square kilometre 0.0032 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 0.0061 kt per square kilometre 0.0041 kt per square kilometre 0.002 kt per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 0.0057 kt per square kilometre 0.0054 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Belarus or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.0056 kt per square kilometre against 0.0055 kt per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Belarus and Eswatini?
0.0001 kt per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Eswatini?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Eswatini rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Belarus ranks 98th and Eswatini ranks 97th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Eswatini: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/belarus/eswatini/">Belarus vs Eswatini: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.