Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Congo
0.0004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
0.0004 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
180th
Guinea-Bissau rank
181st

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Congo
  • Guinea-Bissau
0000.001199020062023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0004 kt per square kilometre against 0.0004 kt per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Congo ranks 180th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 181st of 196 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Guinea-Bissau in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0.0002 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre 0 kt per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
Congo, at 0.0004 kt per square kilometre against 0.0004 kt per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
0 kt per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Congo ranks 180th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 181st of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/guinea-bissau/">Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.