Costa Rica vs Philippines: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Costa Rica
0.0127 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
0.013 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
64th
Philippines rank
61st

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Philippines
0.0040.0060.0080.010.0120.014199020062023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 0.013 kt per square kilometre against 0.0127 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Philippines ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 64th and Philippines ranks 61st of 196 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Philippines Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0053 kt per square kilometre 0.0063 kt per square kilometre 0.0011 kt per square kilometre Philippines
2000s 0.0085 kt per square kilometre 0.0088 kt per square kilometre 0.0004 kt per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 0.0118 kt per square kilometre 0.0106 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 0.0123 kt per square kilometre 0.0121 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Philippines?
Philippines, at 0.013 kt per square kilometre against 0.0127 kt per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Philippines?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Philippines?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Philippines rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 64th and Philippines ranks 61st of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Philippines: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/philippines/">Costa Rica vs Philippines: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.