El Salvador vs Slovenia: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

El Salvador
0.0247 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Slovenia
0.0234 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
El Salvador rank
39th
Slovenia rank
40th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • El Salvador
  • Slovenia
0.0050.010.0150.020.025199020062023

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 0.0247 kt per square kilometre against 0.0234 kt per square kilometre in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0013 kt per square kilometre.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Slovenia ahead.

El Salvador ranks 39th and Slovenia ranks 40th of 196 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0111 kt per square kilometre 0.0144 kt per square kilometre 0.0033 kt per square kilometre Slovenia
2000s 0.0155 kt per square kilometre 0.017 kt per square kilometre 0.0016 kt per square kilometre Slovenia
2010s 0.018 kt per square kilometre 0.022 kt per square kilometre 0.0041 kt per square kilometre Slovenia
2020s 0.0227 kt per square kilometre 0.0219 kt per square kilometre 0.0009 kt per square kilometre El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, El Salvador or Slovenia?
El Salvador, at 0.0247 kt per square kilometre against 0.0234 kt per square kilometre in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between El Salvador and Slovenia?
0.0013 kt per square kilometre, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Slovenia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do El Salvador and Slovenia rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
El Salvador ranks 39th and Slovenia ranks 40th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Slovenia: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/el-salvador/slovenia/">El Salvador vs Slovenia: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.