Malawi vs Turkmenistan: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

Malawi
0.0014 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Turkmenistan
0.0017 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
152nd
Turkmenistan rank
150th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • Malawi
  • Turkmenistan
0.0010.0010.0020.002199020062023

How they compare

Turkmenistan currently reports 0.0017 kt per square kilometre against 0.0014 kt per square kilometre in Malawi, a difference of 0.0003 kt per square kilometre.

That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

Malawi ranks 152nd and Turkmenistan ranks 150th of 196 countries.

Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0005 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2000s 0.0006 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre 0.0006 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2010s 0.0009 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0008 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan
2020s 0.0014 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre 0.0003 kt per square kilometre Turkmenistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, Malawi or Turkmenistan?
Turkmenistan, at 0.0017 kt per square kilometre against 0.0014 kt per square kilometre in Malawi as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between Malawi and Turkmenistan?
0.0003 kt per square kilometre, with Turkmenistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Turkmenistan?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Turkmenistan rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
Malawi ranks 152nd and Turkmenistan ranks 150th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Turkmenistan: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/malawi/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/malawi/turkmenistan/">Malawi vs Turkmenistan: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.