New Caledonia vs Sweden: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre

New Caledonia
0.0036 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.0034 kt per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia rank
123rd
Sweden rank
125th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Sweden
00.0010.0020.0030.004199020062023

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0036 kt per square kilometre against 0.0034 kt per square kilometre in Sweden, a difference of 0.0002 kt per square kilometre.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sweden ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 123rd and Sweden ranks 125th of 196 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 0.002 kt per square kilometre 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.0017 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.0028 kt per square kilometre 0.004 kt per square kilometre 0.0012 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.0037 kt per square kilometre 0.0038 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.0036 kt per square kilometre 0.0035 kt per square kilometre 0.0001 kt per square kilometre New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre, New Caledonia or Sweden?
New Caledonia, at 0.0036 kt per square kilometre against 0.0034 kt per square kilometre in Sweden as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre between New Caledonia and Sweden?
0.0002 kt per square kilometre, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Sweden?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do New Caledonia and Sweden rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per square kilometre?
New Caledonia ranks 123rd and Sweden ranks 125th of 196 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Sweden: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-ar5-per-square-kilometre/new-caledonia/sweden/">New Caledonia vs Sweden: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per square kilometre
Unit
kt per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
197 places, 6,546 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.