Eritrea vs Suriname: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Suriname
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Eritrea rank
69th
Suriname rank
68th
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Eritrea, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Suriname ahead.
Eritrea ranks 69th and Suriname ranks 68th of 193 countries.
Eritrea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Suriname?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Suriname?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Suriname rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) (ar5), per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 69th and Suriname ranks 68th of 193 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.