Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
311.02 kt
in 2023
Pakistan
146.61 kt
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
24th
Pakistan rank
25th

Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Pakistan
0100200300199020062023

How they compare

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) currently reports 311.02 kt against 146.61 kt in Pakistan, a difference of 164.41 kt.

That makes Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s figure about 2.1 times Pakistan's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 24th and Pakistan ranks 25th of 33 groups.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 113.92 kt 42.36 kt 71.55 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 147.63 kt 55.97 kt 91.66 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 239.58 kt 104.07 kt 135.51 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2020s 299.02 kt 145.75 kt 153.27 kt Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — emissions (co2eq) from n2o, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Pakistan?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), at 311.02 kt against 146.61 kt in Pakistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — emissions (co2eq) from n2o between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan?
164.41 kt, with Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Pakistan rank globally for food transport — emissions (co2eq) from n2o?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 24th and Pakistan ranks 25th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-emissions-co2eq-from-n2o-ar5-fao-tier-1/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/pakistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Pakistan: Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
273 places, 8,969 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf