Latvia vs Moldova: Food Transport — Emissions
Food Transport — Emissions over time
- Latvia
- Moldova
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0181 kt against 0.0174 kt in Moldova, a difference of 0.0007 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 139th and Moldova ranks 142nd of 240 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0283 kt | 0.0149 kt | 0.0134 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0295 kt | 0.0101 kt | 0.0193 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0261 kt | 0.0161 kt | 0.01 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0187 kt | 0.017 kt | 0.0017 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher food transport — emissions, Latvia or Moldova?
- Latvia, at 0.0181 kt against 0.0174 kt in Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in food transport — emissions between Latvia and Moldova?
- 0.0007 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Moldova rank globally for food transport — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 139th and Moldova ranks 142nd of 240 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf