China, Macao SAR vs Slovenia: Food Transport — Energy Use

China, Macao SAR
21.22 TJ
in 2023
Slovenia
16.39 TJ
in 2023
China, Macao SAR rank
56th
Slovenia rank
58th

Food Transport — Energy Use over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Slovenia
0510152025201220172023

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 21.22 TJ against 16.39 TJ in Slovenia, a difference of 4.83 TJ.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.3 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Slovenia ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 56th and Slovenia ranks 58th of 65 countries.

China, Macao SAR has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Slovenia Difference Ahead
2010s 11.04 TJ 9.68 TJ 1.35 TJ China, Macao SAR
2020s 18.04 TJ 15.03 TJ 3.01 TJ China, Macao SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — energy use, China, Macao SAR or Slovenia?
China, Macao SAR, at 21.22 TJ against 16.39 TJ in Slovenia as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — energy use between China, Macao SAR and Slovenia?
4.83 TJ, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Slovenia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do China, Macao SAR and Slovenia rank globally for food transport — energy use?
China, Macao SAR ranks 56th and Slovenia ranks 58th of 65 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Slovenia: Food Transport — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/china-macao-sar/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/china-macao-sar/slovenia/">China, Macao SAR vs Slovenia: Food Transport — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
102 places, 2,449 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.