China, mainland vs Uzbekistan: Food Transport — Energy Use

China, mainland
69,271 TJ
in 2023
Uzbekistan
19,147 TJ
in 2023
China, mainland rank
2nd
Uzbekistan rank
3rd

Food Transport — Energy Use over time

  • China, mainland
  • Uzbekistan
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k199520092023

How they compare

China, mainland currently reports 69,271 TJ against 19,147 TJ in Uzbekistan, a difference of 50,124 TJ.

That makes China, mainland's figure about 3.6 times Uzbekistan's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, China, mainland has been ahead every year.

China, mainland ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 65 countries.

China, mainland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, mainland Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
2000s 5,276 TJ 307.42 TJ 4,969 TJ China, mainland
2010s 41,418 TJ 5,343 TJ 36,075 TJ China, mainland
2020s 71,336 TJ 16,574 TJ 54,762 TJ China, mainland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher food transport — energy use, China, mainland or Uzbekistan?
China, mainland, at 69,271 TJ against 19,147 TJ in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
What is the difference in food transport — energy use between China, mainland and Uzbekistan?
50,124 TJ, with China, mainland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Uzbekistan?
22 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
How do China, mainland and Uzbekistan rank globally for food transport — energy use?
China, mainland ranks 2nd and Uzbekistan ranks 3rd of 65 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Food Transport — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, mainland vs Uzbekistan: Food Transport — Energy Use. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/china-mainland/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/food-transport-energy-use-natural-gas-including-lng/china-mainland/uzbekistan/">China, mainland vs Uzbekistan: Food Transport — Energy Use</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Food Transport — Energy Use (Natural Gas, including LNG)
Unit
TJ
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
102 places, 2,449 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Pre- and post- agricultural production includes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and related activity data, generated from pre- and post-agriculture production stages of the agri-food systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). The domain includes methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), carbon dioxide (CO2) and CO2 equivalent (CO2eq) emissions from the above activities as well as the aggregate fluorinated gases (F-gases) emissions. Estimates are available by country, with global coverage and are updated annually.The FAOSTAT domain disseminates information estimates of CH4, N2O, CO2 emissions, F-gases, their aggregates in CO2eq in units of kilotonnes (kt, or 10^6 kg), and the underlying activity data. CO2eq emissions are computed by using the IPCC Fifth Assessment report global warming potentials, AR5 (IPCC, 2014). Data are available for most countries and territories, for standard FAOSTAT regional aggregations, and for Annex I and non-Annex I country groups.